Ebrahim Shakiba; Nahid Khademi; Malihe Khoramdad; Yousef Alimohamadi; Neda Izadi
Volume 19, Issue 8 , August 2017, , Pages 1-6
Abstract
Background: There is some evidence suggesting that Body Mass Index (BMI) may increase plasma lipoprotein levels.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the possible association between BMI and dyslipidemia among the government staff of Kermanshah.Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional ...
Read More
Background: There is some evidence suggesting that Body Mass Index (BMI) may increase plasma lipoprotein levels.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the possible association between BMI and dyslipidemia among the government staff of Kermanshah.Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was performed on the staff of 13 governmental organizations in Kermanshah (a city located in the west of Iran) in 2012. The staff was recruited using census method. We obtained information of 1496 staff aged 22 - 69 through the standardized stepwise questionnaire for NCDs risk factor surveillance. The staff was then physically examined by trained persons. Finally, their blood samples were obtained.Results: The prevalence of dyslipidemia was 16.6% in the study group, with the prevalence of 18.2% in men and 7.9% in women. There were also 53% (55.8% in men and 7.9% in women) and 17.8% (17.6% in men and 38.1% in women) prevalence rates for overweight and obesity, respectively. Dyslipidemia was significantly associated with factors such as BMI (P value = 0.004), gender (P value < 0.001), marital status (P value = 0.01), cigarette smoking (P value = 0.008), and hookah smoking (P value = 0.002), but not with passive smoking, age, education level, physical activity, FBS (fast blood sugar), WHR (waist to hip ratio), hypertension, waist size, and hip size.In the adjusted model, there was a link merely between obesity and dyslipidemia while no statistically significant association was found between dyslipidemia and overweight. Moreover, a non-linear dose-response association was observed between dyslipidemia and BMI.Conclusions: Since dyslipidemia was significantly prevalent among men, fat people, and smokers, a particular attention is crucial to be paid to these groups.
Malihe Khoramdad; Yousef Alimohamadi; Saeed Safiri; Reza Pakzad; Ebrahim Shakiba; Jabbar Shafiei; Alireza Firouzi
Volume 19, Issue 7 , July 2017, , Pages 1-9
Abstract
Context: The relationship between dairy products consumption and the incidence of diabetes is investigated in various studies leading to contradictory results; therefore, the current meta-analytical study aimed at shedding light on the matter and estimating the potentiality of diabetes resulting from ...
Read More
Context: The relationship between dairy products consumption and the incidence of diabetes is investigated in various studies leading to contradictory results; therefore, the current meta-analytical study aimed at shedding light on the matter and estimating the potentiality of diabetes resulting from consuming dairy products.Evidence Acquisition: The study used some reliable electronic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed revised to March 2016. All original articles from prospective cohort and case-cohort studies examining the relationship between dairy products consumption and the risk of diabetes were considered without any restrictions on age, gender, language, race, and publication year. To assess the quality of the study, the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) checklist was employed. The indices of relative risk and rate ratio were reported using the random effect model.Results: Out of 1391 articles, 14 studies (covering 458,082 subjects) were included in the current meta-analysis. The findings showed that consuming dairy products prevents diabetes: total dairy decreases the risk of diabetes by 8% to 12% (relative risk = 0.88 (95%CI: 0.80, 0.96), rate ratio = 0.92 (95%CI: 0.88, 0.97)). The decrease adds up from 11% to 19% in the case of consuming low-fat dairy (relative risk = 0.81 (95%CI: 0.68, 0.96); rate ratio = 0.89 (95%CI: 0.85, 0.93)). In spite of the fact that high-fat dairy diminishes the risk of diabetes, the relationship is not statistically significant (relative risk = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.78, 1.24); rate ratio = 1.01 (95%CI: 0.96, 1.06)).Conclusions: The current study indicated that the consumption of total dairy and low-fat dairy had a preventive impact on the incidence of diabetes; therefore, it seems that drawing up some plans in this regard decreases the risk of the disease.
Malihe Khoramdad; Mehrali Rahimi; Zahra Cheraghi; Neda Izadi; Yousef Alimohamadi; Alireza Firouzi; Jabbar Shafiei
Volume 19, Issue 3 , March 2017, , Pages 1-9
Abstract
Context: There is no global consensus on the issue that what dairy subgroups can affect diabetes; thus, this meta-analysis aims to shed light on this matter. Evidence Acquisition: Main electronic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed, updated to March 2016, were investigated. ...
Read More
Context: There is no global consensus on the issue that what dairy subgroups can affect diabetes; thus, this meta-analysis aims to shed light on this matter. Evidence Acquisition: Main electronic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed, updated to March 2016, were investigated. All original articles from Prospective Cohort and Case-Cohort studies examining the relationship between dairy products subgroups consumption and the risk of diabetes were brought under consideration without any restrictions on age, gender, language, race, and publication year. To validate this study, the STROBE checklist was used. The indices of relative risk and rate ratio were reported using Random Effect Model.Results: Out of 1391 articles, 13 (covering 421,421 people) were introduced to the current meta-analysis. The findings showed that the consumption of yoghurt and cream has preventive effects on the risk of diabetes: Yogurt: relative risk = 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.84), rate ratio = 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.70); Cream: rate ratio = 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.91). Although the relative risk index showed that milk consumption diminishes the risk of diabetes by 11%, this relationship was not statistically significant: Milk: relative risk = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.97), rate ratio = 1.07 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.24). This study also indicated that intake of low-fat milk, ice cream, and cheese has no impact on the incidence of diabetes: Cheese: relative risk = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.04), rate ratio = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.16); Low-fat milk: rate ratio = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.14); Ice cream: rate ratio = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.18). Conclusions: Due to the scarcity of studies related to some dairy subgroups, it is not possible to make a final judgment about their effects on the risk of diabetes; therefore, more studies need to be conducted on this issue.